TIME STUDY: CASE HARDNESS TESTING OF AUTOMOTIVE CRANK PINS AND JOURNALS:

Publisher: Buehler

Access this content

Your content has been opened.

Please verify you are a human before downloading this content.

TIME STUDY: CASE HARDNESS TESTING OF AUTOMOTIVE CRANK PINS AND JOURNALS: has been emailed to . Entered the wrong email?

Don't see the content in your inbox?
Make sure to check your spam and other messages folders.

Can't get to your email right now?

To complete your registration and access this content, enter the sign-in code sent to your email.

Please enter a valid verification code.

Code sent to:

Also, remember to check in your spam, promotions, and other folders.


Register to access this content


By accessing content on the Heat Treating Society Online Buyer's Guide you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy; and, you acknowledge that your information may be shared with the content publisher.

TIME STUDY: CASE HARDNESS TESTING OF AUTOMOTIVE CRANK PINS AND JOURNALS:

A study shows an operator time savings of 86% for making and measuring indents in three locations of crank pins and journals when using Buehler's hardness automation compared to manual testing. There was less part manipulation, fewer errors in data transcription and lower variability between operators performing tests.A large automotive manufacturer wanted to investigate the potential time savings of using automation for hardness testing crank pins and journals. Their existing process required two skilled operators per shift, two shifts per day, seven days per week. Tests were performed in three specified locations, two at forty-five degrees off axis and one perpendicular to the axis. Specified location sare critical, as missed locations could lead to manufactured parts being held in quarantine until further confirmation can be performed.For the implemented process a Wilson VH3100 series Vickers Microhardness Tester with DiaMet software was used.