Content Summary
compared to manual testing. There was less part manipulation, fewer errors in data transcription and lower variability between operators performing tests.A large automotive manufacturer wanted to investigate the potential time savings of using automation for hardness testing crank pins and journals. Their existing process required two skilled operators per shift, two shifts per day, seven days per week. Tests were performed in three specified locations, two at forty-five degrees off axis and one perpendicular to the axis. Specified location sare critical, as missed locations could lead to manufactured parts being held in quarantine until further confirmation can be performed.For the implemented process a Wilson VH3100 series Vickers Microhardness Tester with DiaMet software was used.
Access this content
Choose an option below
Your content has been opened.
Register to access this content
Verify your email to access this content
Code sent. Enter it in the modal
Your content has been opened.
Why do I need to verify I’m human?
Please verify you are a human before opening this content.
Your content has been opened.
The content will open in a new window. You may need to allow popups for this site.